The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete I appreciate the effort put into this but Wikipedia is not an appropriate platform for hosting detailed information about a fictional work which can only be studied by reading that fictional work. If some of the citations were to books or articles discussing the article's subject, then I would say keep, but it seems that the content in this article is coming only from the work of fiction itself.
Blue Rasberry (talk)22:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete as a fictional in-universe topic without significant cultural impact or substantial coverage in independently-published sources. Wikia is thattaway -----> (Jimmy Wales thanks you for your business and hopes you are pleased.)
Carrite (
talk)
17:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.