The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 16:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

College Football on CBS results (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTE (the results of those specific CF games that have been broadcast by CBS, are not separately notable as a group). Fails also WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Fram ( talk) 09:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Speedy Delete There's nothing encyclopedicly appropriate at all here. -- MASEM ( t) 01:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• Delete Errrrrgh, another one of these. No sources and even then, nobody outside of sports TV nuts cares about where a game is broadcast, just that it airs on TV somewhere; a CBS logo doesn't make it special. Nate • ( chatter) 03:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Delete Right now it's just a list, and a poorly conceived one at that. It could become a really awesome article rather than just a list of scores if an enthusiastic editor would research details of the subject. Alas, I'm not that enthusiastic. But I'd support anyone making such a change. As it stands, I think Wikipedia would be better off without this list.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 03:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.