- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cobrex Trans ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tiny airline that has one plane (they had two in the past?). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. I don't think all transportation companies, even airlines, are automatically notable, and this one seems to be quite unremarkable. For a Romanian company, they don't even have an entry on the Romanian Wikipedia, that's another red flag. Creator is blocked, and has speedy deletion notices for presumably similar busiensses, Tayaran Jet and Air Ban among others. (Still remain: ALK Airlines with 4 planes and Fly2Sky Airlines with 3). Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep / do not delete For defunct licenced airlines, even if they are small, that get to the stage of carrying passengers in return for money, we generally leave the page on Wikipedia. It may have been small but it was a licenced airline carrying a non-trivial number of passengers for a non-trivial period of time.
Pmbma (
talk)
13:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pmbma, Can you show a policy that supports this claim? I see noting at WP:AFDOUTCOMES, and the results of - for example - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Airlines, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East African Airlines, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hajvairy Airlines, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star1 Airlines or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Air, to name just a few, contradict your claim. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This is (was) a company/organization therefore WP:NCORP applies. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails NCORP. HighKing ++ 16:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 13:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.