The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - Of course it wasn't a speech, but he certainty made the news afterwards. He was there for his entertainment value. It was an Eastwood performance, what he does so well, this time at a political convention. It was possibly more remembered than anything else that happened at the convention that night. As such, he did what he was hired for, and had people talking about it for a long time afterwards. We're discussing it now. It's part of a series on Eastwood, and should remain as such.
— Maile (
talk)
15:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. If NOTNEWS, then why is it being discussed on the national stage 10 years later?
[1]. Here's
[2] a mention about it in 2020. This in addition to coverage in later presidential election cycle years.
[3],
[4] I would support renaming, maybe to Clint Eastwood's empty chair speech.
Jacona (
talk)
14:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.