The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Lacks references, references has minor mentions.
Ireneshih (
talk) 16:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - Either it "lacks references" or the references "ha[ve] minor mentions." Which one so I know the deletion rationale and can evaluate accordingly. Once of many AfDs you have done that I am scratching my head about. --
CNMall41 (
talk) 20:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - He is a leading historian of Korean Art and porcelain. His work is cited frequently but it's hard to find the information someone mention about himself. I've filled up short mention about his works. --
Chaseklee (
talk) 00:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep passes GNG in the normal way; he's been getting newspaper articles written about him for half a century.
210.6.254.106 (
talk) 02:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep likely as this will particularly need familiar attention as it seems sources exist.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep At this point, the article has been improved to where it manifestly meets notability requirements, and I believe
WP:SK would apply.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 18:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.