From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 04:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Christian Raster (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced biography of a person with no strong claim of notability. This asserts that he was a "statesman", but fails to specify what political role he might have held to earn that title, and that he was an administrative officer to a nobleman (which is not a notability criterion at all), and that his son was notable. But notability is not inherited, so a person with no standalone notability claim of his own does not get a Wikipedia article just to help fill out his son's genealogy -- and the only source cited here at all is his son's autobiography, with no evidence of independent media coverage about his "statesman" or "administrative officer" roles being shown at all. Nothing here, either in the sourcing or the substance, is compelling grounds for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat ( talk) 17:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 17:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 17:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete being an "administrative officer" to a nobleman is not a position of notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:12, 8 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  —  F R + 05:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Nothing to it. Literally. - The Gnome ( talk) 13:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete mentioned in article on his son, redirect is not needed since there is no sourcing beyond the mention son's bio. Being an administrator to an 18th century aristocrat could be notable, but if he was my searches in gBooks would have produced something about him. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 23:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.