- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Christian Burridge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Burridge does not meet the notability guidelines for politicians. Canadiates for the US house do not pass notability guidelines on that alone, nor do county party chairs. Also, the article essentially has no sources except the link that may establish he was county party chair. Definately nothing like a reliable source. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I concur as our politicians notability is quite clear and there's literally nothing close to it for notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-winning candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, especially if the resulting article is completely unsourced. Bearcat ( talk) 07:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as does not meet WP:NPOL for significant press coverage. Burroughs'10 ( talk) 12:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.