The result was delete. In particular, there is concensus that this person does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, making it a coatrack for his conviction. — Coren (talk) 00:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC) reply
This was nominated for deletion before, and was kept for no consensus. I am nominating it again now because it has been several years and I don't feel that this person is really notable per WP:POLITICIAN or probably any of the notability guidelines. He has only been a candidate for a couple of offices and lost those. Concerning the section on his conviction I'm not sure if that is really notable enough of an incident to include either. If the article is kept, yes, that should be included, but don't think that merely running for office and being convicted of something really, truly adds up to notability. Thank you. JoannaSerah ( talk) 20:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC) reply