The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Chris Barnes (actor)

Chris Barnes (actor) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep unless nominator wishes to expand their rationale for deletion. At minimum, these actors should be redirected to the movie/franchise. Caro7200 ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment: Pinging Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Barnes (actor) participants: Damiens.rf ( talk · contribs), Mandsford ( talk · contribs), Paulmcdonald ( talk · contribs), Dhartung ( talk · contribs), and Alansohn ( talk · contribs).

  Cunard ( talk) 07:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Barnes clearly passes WP:NACTOR's criteria as he "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films", specifically the Bad News Bears films, where his role as Tanner Boyle is consistently described in sources in the article and elsewhere as a significant role. Alansohn ( talk) 14:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep we've had this discussion before and the answer was clear. While it's certainly acceptable to reconsider AFDs (especially over a length of time), the nominator needs to provide an actual reason to overturn the previous consensus, and pointing to just a policy is a widely-accepted argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Per nominator is in that same boat. I see no reason to delete or overturn the previous discussion and none has been given. If a reason were brought forward, we can discuss it. Otherwise, I suggested a close.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply
• Comment If people want to claim his role in the Bad News Boys was significant, we need sources that show that. Reliable sources, not IMDB. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Response I do not see any IMDB "references" in the "references" section. That is in the "external links" section. The "references" section calls on multiple articles from 1977 to 1998. I see Milwaukee Journal, Los Angeles Times, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, ...-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 00:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep Tony Award winner. Meets WP:ENT. I have significantly updated his page with his Broadway plays, etc. Peter303x ( talk) 09:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Sorry got him confused with another actor. He is not Tony award winner. However, based on arguments of prior Nomination , it's a Keep. It should not have been re-nominated. Peter303x ( talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.