The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ ^discuss 09:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Ching Cheung Ying (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability guidelines. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Redirect Sha Tin District Council, weak keep One of the more significant mention [1]. Medal of Honour source is extremely weak [2], amounting only like "Ching did good at the DC, so here's a medal". Mostly it is just Ching invited for comment for various news events (eg. [3] [4] [5]) passing passing passingly listed passing in DC opponent interview passing. 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 03:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 03:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 03:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 03:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Can't see any more than local notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 12:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep. I found the same sources as User:Hisashiyarouin and would say they amount to a bare pass of WP:GNG. I think his inclusion on the 2007 Hong Kong honours list is of substantial importance - very few opposition politicians in Hong Kong get them. Local notability is still notability. Der yck C. 16:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.