- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G5, sockpuppet of User:Mostly shoaib Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Children and Atheism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Children and Atheism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability. Reviews come from not independent [1] or unreliable sources (a 2020 article on user-published "Medium.com" which discusses a 2022 book? [2]). Nothing on Google News, barely anything on Google in general [3]. Fram ( talk) 08:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Atheism. Fram ( talk) 08:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I removed the most egregious of the sources (Inquisitr, GoodReads, and Medium, all of which are not RS per WP:RSP). What's left are a product listing (Google Books); the author's website (Fadew Magazine); a product listing (Open Library); a product listing (Google Play Books); a product listing (BookBub); a product listing (BookBrainz); and, finally, a one-sentence mention in a short article without so much as a byline (European Atheists). Overall, there isn't one actual review to go off. This is pure promotion for a non-notable book. -- Kbabej ( talk) 00:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.