From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Child Labour: A Review in the Context of Nepal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No content. Seems to be an essay, not an article on any topic. Tamravidhir ( talk) 11:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It is a thesis report, aka an essay. docstore version and his personal blog version. The blog version may or may not contain viruses, so view the docstore version first. @ Tamravidhir and Hisashiyarouin: The rule is to wait 15 minutes before attaching any tags, unless it is a blatant speedy. Personally, I would have waited a bit as it appears they were working on it. But, it is a judgement call. In cases where it appears to be an essay or copied, then do a Google search first. Search on some quoted sentences. That is how I found the above two links as I searched for "Child labour is a serious and wide spread problem in South Asia and African countries and the situation is not different in Nepal also.". This normally would be a case for a Speedy under copyright violation, but docstore's copyright is "Public Domain". Bgwhite ( talk) 04:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Reply: @ Bgwhite: So that means that we should wait for 15 minutes since it was created before tagging it. But if it should be immediately deleted then we should nominate it for deletion. and again docstore's content is in public domain. But it's again one's personal thesis. So in that case it should be deleted, na? I'm confused. :/ -- Tamravidhir ( talk!) 10:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Looks like a prospectus. Non-notable book, many of the facts have been well included on Child labour in Nepal. Bladesmulti ( talk) 06:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Looks like bookpromo and a content fork of Child labour in Nepal. No need to keep this. The Banner  talk 04:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - essay/promo/personal analysis/synth/OR/content fork, as per what others have said. Neatsfoot ( talk) 03:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.