- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Chiharu Komatsu
- Chiharu Komatsu ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories and passing mentions. Japanese Wiki article is equally unconvincing for notability, mostly consisting of a list of minor appearances. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:ENT. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Hasn't won any awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 01:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the Japanese article names a dozen sources and sources don't have to be in English to establish notability, so this article could stay with the whole "translation wanted" template being enough. -- Donald Trung ( Talk) ( Articles) 08:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have addressed the ja.wiki article in my nomination:
Japanese Wiki article is equally unconvincing for notability, mostly consisting of a list of minor appearances.
It also includes: "Her hobby is writing poetry and listening to music" -- nothing here is encyclopedic content. The sources in ja.wiki page are underwhelming; for example, this is routine promo piece: [1]. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have addressed the ja.wiki article in my nomination:
- Delete does not meet our already too broad inclusion criteria for this profession. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per WP:GNG Komatsu has enough coverage to be considered notable for an entry. Lonehexagon ( talk) 23:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Nom's comment -- I've addressed the sourcing in my nomination; the subject lacks WP:SIGCOV to meet requirements for a stand-alone article. Simply saying that the subject "has enough coverage", without specifying what this coverage is, generally is insufficient in a deletion discussion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.