The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. County commissioners are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — a county commissioner might occasionally get into Wikipedia if they either (a) can be properly referenced as having had preexisting notability for other reasons independently of their office, and/or (b) can be referenced to a depth and volume and geographic range of coverage that clearly demonstrates him as a special case of significantly greater notability than most other county councillors, but this satisfies neither of those conditions.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I sometimes argue for keeping a county commissioner, but in this case I am not seeing especially notable achievements, and I note that the population of the county is only 364,000.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
14:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I do have to point out that being a township commissioner is a lot lower level than being a county comissioner. However considering that we are no where near having articles on most state legislators, except those who served since the creation of Wikipedia, and we are lacking articles on most members of the legislature of Zaire or Ghana, allowing random creation of articles on county commisioners will only make Wikipedia more US centric and more presentist.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.