The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Noone had thought to add a references tag to make them show at the bottom, which is why they didn't work. I've done that now so they can be viewed. The article needs work and some cleaning up, but the subject does demonstrate some notability. There's a newspaper article and one at wired.com, which are full articles and not trivial mentions.
Polenth23:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. If kept the article needs to be renamed so that "TV series" is removed from the article name. That designation is only for articles on programs broadcast on television, not made-for-Internet.
23skidoo01:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - No real assertion of notability, this article is full of weasely POV claims with litte substance ("The response has been positive.", etc.). The only "reliable source" is a blurb on wired.com -- hardly a "notable TV series". /
Blaxthos11:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge→
Buffyverse (fan films). There is sufficient information and source support for a section in the broader topical article related to Buffyverse fan films, but insufficient to support a stand-alone article. The redirect created by the merge should be sent to
WP:RFD as a misleading title. If the article is kept, it should be moved to more relevant title in use as a redirect,
Cherub (Buffyverse). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me)
14:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.