- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 09:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Chaya Ratan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN, also not any political background. Only a candidate of Aam Aadmi Party from Secunderabad. It's a promotional page which is created by Aam Aadmi Party-centric contributors. Prateek Malviya Talk 05:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure how it fails point 3 of WP:POLITICIAN. Since you are a self-professed supporter of BJP party from your user page, I did like to see independent and unbiased request for deletion as well as a clear refutal of point 3! Chandresh Prakash Talk 17:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Candidate for an office, these are almost never notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment @ Chandresh Prakash Chaya Ratan has no significant coverage that's why I am nominate for deletion of this page. If any significant coverage for unelected candidate only then any politician (or person) is notable ( see here). I think (If I am right) this is her first election. Also Naveen Jaihind's, who is candidate from Rohtak, page two time deleted by this reason (look this and this). Hope you Understand. Prateek Malviya Talk 05:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Chandra Prakash, our rule on Wikipedia is that an unelected candidate for office is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate — if you cannot make a credible case that she was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article before she became a candidate, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to become notable enough. And that rule is the same no matter what political party a person is associated with, so it doesn't matter whether she's running for the BJP, the AAP, the BSP or the Silly Party. Bearcat ( talk) 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- weak delete, there are some mentions of her prior to the campaign, but can't find anything that would clearcut establish notability. -- Soman ( talk) 10:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.