The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Stifle (
talk) 17:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Terrible article, but he was a member of a national legislature and is therefore notable under
WP:POLITICIAN. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 23:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep – I agree with Necrothesp. The article is awful, but he is still fairly notable.
United States Man (
talk) 02:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment: Do we have a
reliable source for his service in Parliament? Without that it's hard to establish notability. This is also a
BLP issue.
Lagrange613 01:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 12:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Even though this article is badly written it still falls under
WP:POLITICIAN and need a rewrite not be deleted.--
Jeffrd10 (
talk) 13:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Lagrange613 has a valid point. Is this person really a member of parliament? The subject is not listed on the
National Assembly website. The only supplied
semi-reliable reference lists another person winning the NA-135 constituency. Only the infobox suggests that the subject is anything more than a local politician.
• Gene93k (
talk) 16:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.