The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 05:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as absolutely nothing convincing and only a mere listing.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, obvious A7 candidate ("He addresses high-profile issues affecting natural resources and economic development by informing policy changes, improving program implementation, and managing projects effectively" are fine words, but since it's unsourced and presumably from a press release isn't remotely approaching a credible claim of significance.) ‑
Iridescent 18:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment I originally A7ed it but another editor disagreed, which is why I went via AfD.
JamesG5 (
talk) 20:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.