The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - this is so advertorial that it could legitimately be felt to breach
G11. That aside for now, NPOL isn't satisfied and coverage as a lawyer doesn't appear to be sufficient to demonstrate notability.
Nosebagbear (
talk)
22:53, 28 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Leechburg is not remotely large enough to extend a presumption of notability on its mayors just because they exist, but the article is referenced nowhere near well enough to get him over
WP:GNG. There's definitely some
advertorialism going on here, because this features one of the biggest disconnects between the length of the article and the scantiness of its sourcing that I've seen in quite some time.
Bearcat (
talk)
03:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.