The result was keep without prejudice to continued discussion about a merger. This was an ill-considered renomination. Again, AfD is not the proper forum to discuss mergers. The WP:POVFORK argument would not seem to apply, because as of this writing the subject of the "celebrations" article is merely addressed in a brief section in the "reactions" article, which is in keeping with WP:SS. (That's not an opinion about the content at issue, including its merits, encyclopedicity or neutrality.) Sandstein ( talk) 10:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC) reply
I have already nominated this article for deletion three weeks ago, the result was "not delete" and a recommendation to discuss merging the article. So why am I nominating the article for AfD again now? Because a new article has been created: International reactions to the September 11, 2001 attacks, and discussions happened on whether to merge/delete the celebrations article, no consensus was reached about that, and that's why a deletion review is needed here. The way I see it, the celebrations article is a content fork of the international reactions article, and arguably a POVFork, the celebrations article covers a minor event in the context of the reactions to the Sept 11 attacks, and does not include any significant information that the reactions article does not . Imad marie ( talk) 22:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply