The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016.  Sandstein  20:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Cecil Ince (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable candidate for POTUS. Fails to meet WP:BIO OR WP:POLITICIAN. reddogsix ( talk) 16:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete as certainly questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. A person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate in a minor party's presidential primary (and even for the major parties, the articles exist because they already had preexisting notability for other things, not just because they're candidates in the primary.) While the presidential election is that rare political beast that's so widely covered that even a non-winning candidate who fails WP:NPOL can sometimes still clear WP:GNG, that means the candidate on the general election ballot, not every candidate in the primary — and the media coverage still has to actually materialize. No prejudice against recreation after the Libertarian Party convention if he wins and the GNG piles up as a result — but the mere fact of being a candidate in the primary doesn't get him an article today. Bearcat ( talk) 10:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Not finding significant coverage in reliable outside sources. Subject is not notable per the guidelines laid out in WP:42 or WP:NPOL. Alternatively, a redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016 might be considered.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 16:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect – not notable, but he is noteworthy enough to list as a 2016 LP candidate, with non-promotional RS. – S. Rich ( talk) 18:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC) reply
• Redirect - as per S. Rich -- Hybris1984 ( talk) 16:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.