The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Surely a studio that produced around 500 movies, mostly in the 1980s and 1990s including some of the most well-known titles and stars is notable and should have the entry expanded not deleted
Cannonmc (
talk)
23:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Expansion requires support from
reliable sources. The article does not have them, and independent searches yield only trivial mentions, failing
WP:CORPDEPTH as the nominator states. Porn films are run off in large numbers. That's why x-number of films was taken out of WP:PORNBIO 13 years ago. If this studio was as influential as you say, where are the independent reliable sources that attest to that?
• Gene93k (
talk)
01:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete as complete
WP:CORP failure. Even if you count the porn trade press as semi-reliable, their coverage consists of repackaged press releases and routine release or change of personnel announcements.
• Gene93k (
talk)
01:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Strong delete per nom and @
Gene93k:. I couldn't find one Google web search that was about this pornography producer. There were lots of videos that showed up in the results, presumably some of which were this producer's productions, but nothing that counts as
WP:SIGCOV. Of the Google news search results, again, little if anything beyond passing mentions. Lots of results related to "Catalina video" or "Catalina (video)" and similar—nothing about this company.
Doug Mehus (
talk)
18:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.