The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)reply
WP:BLP of an artist and designer, whose only stated claim of notability is that she got a project development grant in 2014. This is not based on any
reliable source coverage about her -- of the three sources here, two are
primary sources and one is a transcript of a Q&A interview on a podcast. As always, every person is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she and her work exist -- she must be the subject of enough
reliable source coverage to verify that she passes
WP:CREATIVE for something.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak keep for now.Delete without prejudice to recreation if more sources become available. It appears that the the movie that the grant was intended to support has now been released. It has received some coverage, including the
New York Times, which is a bit "thin". I've added a more substantial source to the article. There might be more sources, I'm still looking.
Mduvekot (
talk) 18:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Update: struck weak keep. I was unable to find any additional sources. It is probably
WP:TOOSOON.
Mduvekot (
talk) 11:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)reply
keep I think the NYT article along with the award makes her notable for
WP:BLP — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KindleReader (
talk •
contribs) 21:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. good nomination, as the artist's notability is not established by diverse reliable sources, nor museum collections, nor significant shows. Sources and notability are thin.
104.163.140.99 (
talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete clearly does not meet any of our guidelines for articles on artists.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 07:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.