The result was Delete, for the record, all but one of the keeps was a single-purpose account, and the other was the article's creator Deville ( Talk) 14:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable neologism, per WP:NEO. With a limited number of search engine hits, I doubt the accuracy of this article. Likely hoax, it is only used officially on a vegan-pro website, which, according to the article, was the coin-er of the term. Iola k ana• T 17:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
~mjoy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Melanie Joy ( talk • contribs) .
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.137.49 ( talk • contribs) 10:19, 2 September 2006.