The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article about a small campground with no independent sources and without assertion of notability
Nyttend 11:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable, probably should of been speedied.
Wikidudeman(talk) 11:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Trash/Delete at least the bottom part and the rest can be integrated to Malibu or Santa-Monica articles whatever it is the best option.--
JForget 18:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete advertisement--
SefringleTalk 05:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. This appears to be a worthwhile article. A little research on this camp shows that is is quite well known within the blind community in Southern California—admittedly a small community, but not to be ignored. With about 5000 Google hits, on the first ten search pages, at least 95% of the hits referred to this camp in Malibu, with a few to a similarly named camp in Iowa. I added some external links and categories to the article. If the article is kept, I will commit to cleaning it up and expanding it (and moving it to
Camp Bloomfield). ●
DanMS •
Talk 21:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep and give DanMS the chance to cleanup, per his evidence of possible notability. Daniel 10:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. Notable topic, not-so-good article. The answer is to not be sloppy and "oh, well, we'll just delete it" - it's to fix the damned article.
Rebecca 10:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.