The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given the lack of input despite two relists. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

CIA activities in South Africa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe that all of the "CIA activities in..." articles should be deleted—in fact, I'm a major contributor to two of the more notable ones, CIA activities in Iraq and CIA activities in Syria—but CIA activities in South Africa seems to fail WP:GNG. Right now all we have is a single primary source document. (The CIA's uproven role in Mandela's arrest is covered elsewhere, though not mentioned in this article.) TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 22:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.