- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
C. C. Saint-Clair
- C. C. Saint-Clair ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a vanity page on an unremarkable self-published author; I'm unable to locate any library listings in WorldCat Identities. The sources listed are either blogs or interviews. Scriptapalooza mentioned in the article has been deleted several times on G11 grounds. Article tagged for notability since 2008 and still fails to establish it. Created by Special:Contributions/Soulward with no other contributions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable. The references in the article seem to be the only coverage that exists, and of those, the Curve interview is the only thing resembling an independent, reliable source. The rest are, like her books, self-published. Not nearly enough for WP:GNG. Kolbasz ( talk) 12:52, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable writer. When we get told the subject made the quarter finals in a competition we do not even have an article on, I take that to mean they are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.