The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge with something (I don't know quite what). It is notable, but only within the context of another UN article with more meat. --
BWD (
talk)17:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep but rename. The episode is probably complex enough that if it were merged elsewhere it would bloat it unreasonably. But the name 'bugging the UN' is absurd.
Bucketsofg18:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep as this is a major event for UN-US/UK relations. It shows that
NSA is used to spy on much more than just enemy activity, and that no morale apparently is applied since spying was used to further political agendaes. We should NOT hide this major incident in obscure subsections in other articles.
A human03:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment: It sounds a little sensationalized. And surveillance of diplomats is not really unexpected, although I imagine it's a violation of something. And the title is awful; maybe NSA UN diplomat electronic surveillance? Does the media have a catchy name for it?
Peter Grey08:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.