The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Subject is only recognized for one event that he organized, which won an award, thus not notable.
Meatsgains (
talk) 03:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep He didn't win the most important enterprise award in the country for organising the Harrogate Christmas market - important thought that is! It was for forty years of work building enterprise in the region. Meets
WP:ANYBIO for the award, and
WP:GNG. All the best: RichFarmbrough, 16:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC).reply
Note adding material from the National Archives. All the best: RichFarmbrough, 17:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC).reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now and draft and userfy at best as the current sourcing is simply not convincing enough and although I found more at Books and News for starters, it would at best be better for him to be mentioned at the Yorkshire Business Market's article, not independently notable for a separate article yet.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Please provide the additional sources you found. All the best: RichFarmbrough, 12:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC).reply
Note additional documents received under FOI, so may well be yet more RS to add. All the best: RichFarmbrough, 01:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC).reply
Keep. Refs look ok now. I considered voting delete when this was first put up for afd, but decided to sit on the fence. As mentioned the article has been much improved.
Szzuk (
talk) 20:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.