The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 00:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I was going to trim it, but there is no trimming it. I do not believe that this person needs a Wikipedia article. None of his positions make him inherently notable, and the best of the sources I can find ( this) only speak to tax fraud--the article is for a large part an attempt to set the record straight, albeit an attempt full of unverified stuff and argumentative writing. I think this BLP should go. Drmies ( talk) 03:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC) reply