The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I do not believe this individual meets
WP:NBIO or
WP:GNG based on the information presented in the article, nor can I find any substantial coverage of him in reliable independent sources.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
13:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. As written, the article contains just two sentences stating that he exists as a person who has had jobs, while containing no substance to indicate why he would be notable for that, and the referencing isn't getting him over
WP:GNG either: two of the four sources here are his own
self-published contributor profiles on the websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with, while a third is a Q&A interview in which he's speaking about himself on a podcast. The last is a "five things to know about him" listicle in a digital magazine, but that publication's status as a notability-making source is debatable at best — and even if we take the charitable position on that question, it still takes much more than just one acceptable source to get a person over GNG. So no, neither the substance present here nor the sourcing provided to support it are enough.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.