The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
second nomination, not durably notable, most of the article is announcements of self-published videos. This is the second nomination, several strong cases for deletion were made in 2009, and this article hasn't aged well in 6 years
Kintetsubuffalo (
talk)
11:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep as an extremely notable meme / fictional character, Passes
WP:EN &
WP:GNG, Are we going to nominate
Earth next?.... Also the delete !votes are utterly pointless in every sense of the word -
WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason for deletion, Someone should close this as a clear Keep as it's not going to ever be deleted anytime this century. –
Davey2010Talk13:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 21:53 22 February 2015reply
Speedy Keep. Lol, those may be the most absurd "deletion" rationales I've seen all week. 'No need' for pokemon characters either, but here we are just the same. This topic has an immense amount of coverage in major newspapers like The Guardian, the only possible reason I can see to delete would be for "unambiguous advertising." the page, however, is nicely written.
Earflaps (
talk)
06:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.