- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 15:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Bokhodir Choriyev ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Political opinion piece. No inline references. Unreliable sources and dead links. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. Article is so poorly written that I can't even suss out what his basic notability claim is supposed to be, and the "references" aren't helping much: aside from being contextlessly linkfarmed rather than actually footnoting any of the content, one of them is an outright dead link that just lands blank, two more are dead links which automatically redirect back to the source's front splash page rather than to any verifiable content, one just namechecks his existence in an article that isn't about him, and one is a Q&A interview in which he's quoted talking about something other than himself and thus isn't its subject. And while there's one source present that might genuinely be about him — it's written in Uzbek, so I can't personally evaluate its substance or lack thereof — it still takes more than just one GNG-worthy source to pass GNG. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write an article which properly demonstrates and sources that he passes a Wikipedia notability criterion, but this article as written isn't cutting the mustard. Bearcat ( talk) 16:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- unsourced WP:ADVOCACY. There might be enough RS out there for a short article: sample news results, but this article ain't it. BTW, the subject appears to be better known as Bakhodir Choriev. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article needs to be rewritten with clear statements of what makes him notable. At present it is so badly written it is not worth keeping. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.