From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blockchain#Uses. Black Kite (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Blockchain game (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find video game sources:  "Blockchain game" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Vague rambling around a neologism rather than a common term found in RSes. This has never been a coherent article. It's also a spam magnet - this is the version culled of the worst spammy bad cites. (Previous version here.) Of the remaining four references, one is a marketing blog for a consultant firm, and two of the RS sources don't even mention the supposed genre. Declined PROD asserting notability of the neologism, but without providing evidence. David Gerard ( talk) 23:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. David Gerard ( talk) 23:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. David Gerard ( talk) 23:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Joeccho:, WP:ITEXISTS is not an argument. Also, your first edit is a keep vote. That's never a good sign. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Soetermans:, Previously I participate in another language of wikipedia, and mostly participate anonymously. Joeccho ( talk) 11:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It looks like consensus is verging towards deleting or re-purposing the article, but it's not clear yet. Hopefully another week can fix this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte ( talk | work) 12:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 01:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.