The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not a lot of RS coverage of this person. I tried to look for some more RS coverage to beef up the article but the RS are scarce and the few RS that cover this person do so briefly.
Snooganssnoogans (
talk)
11:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
It is. Thing is that I consider Newsweek a borderline RS, and if Newsweek is a RS (I do believe the RS noticeboard still considers it as a RS), it's still one of few to actually cover White at depth.
Snooganssnoogans (
talk)
12:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
I'd definitely consider Newsweek and e.g. the New York Daily News reliable despite operating poorly in the recent times, simply because they de facto continue to accurately report the news. Reliability should be judged on the number of scandals, not on the number of fact-checkers they employ. wumbolo^^^12:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Let me make this clear, I believe Blaire White only has significant coverage because she appeals to the lowest common denominator, so of course conservative and anti-alt-right sites jump to cover her. But, with that out of the way, I think there's definitely enough coverage to classify as notable.
Ottoshade (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
06:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.