The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The only thing clear about this search engine is that it's profitable for the creator. Data already in the article appear to show that the energy saving is an illusion. These facts suggest that blackle.com will not be around for the long haul, and is thus not encyclopedic. Only one newspaper article. The other sources don't refer to blackle.com itself, or are not independent of the creator. EdJohnston 12:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC) reply
*Delete:
Google hits aside, most of them seem to point to blogs - even the WSJ write-up is on their blog. It's a novel concept, but novelty doesn't equal notability.
Sidatio 13:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
MyTigers 18:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC) reply