The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Actually looking at the sources provided by
Lordtobi it does seem to have could enough sources to be made into a workable article but currently no sources are even provided in the article thus is essentially
WP:OR for all I know so I would still suggest this to be redirected until it can be appropriately sourced.
Spy-cicle💥 Talk?21:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Apparently Game Informer reviewed it in the
November 2002 issue as well. This review was incorrectly attributed to a different Bionicle game in GameRankings. I’m going to withdraw this nomination. There seems to be enough to salvage something here. ToaNidhiki0518:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The nominator has withdrawn in a later comment, but a redirect !vote exists. Regarding the redirect !vote, it is of note that per
WP:NEXIST, topic notability does not hinge upon the state of sourcing in articles. Overall, this discussion would benefit from more input for a solid consensus to form.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America100011:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.