The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep, considering the
2010 news article which is quite comprehensive. There's also this
2012 article in the Boston Globe. There may be other coverage, considering this is not a local council election, rather it is an election for mayor of a major city and Walczak obviously has some importance in the area. Okay, we all know this article needs to avoid becoming a platform for his current election campaign, but I think the non-political coverage creeps him over the
WP:GNG threshold.
Sionk (
talk) 01:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree that he's not notable as a politician, but he does meet notability in other areas.
HillbillyGoat (
talk) 01:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(
talk page) 13:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.