The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 23:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Bhai Baldeep Singh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that he meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Certainly no evidence, or even clear assertion, of meeting WP:MUSICBIO. Boleyn ( talk) 19:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 19:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 19:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 19:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Many google news results about different instances. ^[1] passes GNG. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 08:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC) reply

ChunnaBhai, are you connected to the subject of the article? Boleyn ( talk) 08:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC) reply

I am not connected to the subject of the article. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 05:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete candidates for office will get news coverage, but we have decided not all candidates are notable. Subject does not pass notability guidelines.
• Delete. Unelected candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just because some campaign coverage exists — campaign coverage always exists for all candidates in all elections, so every candidate would always clear GNG if that were all it took. Rather, to get a candidate into Wikipedia, what would need to be shown is that either (a) he already had enough preexisting notability to qualify for a Wikipedia article for some other reason anyway, or (b) the campaign coverage exploded significantly out of proportion to what most other candidates could show. But neither of those things is being demonstrated here at all. Bearcat ( talk) 22:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.