The result was keep as passing WP:V and WP:N. More cites need to be added from the ones found. Bearian ( talk) 19:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete not independently notable per WP:BIO. Veritas ( talk) 14:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply
a standard which appears to be satisfied here by substantial coverage in history texts as described above. Per WP:NOT#CENSORED, we don't delete articles because we disagree with the manner in which their subjects' notability has been achieved. John254 00:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC) replyA topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
If third-party reliable sources endorse the importance of the subject of an article by providing substantial coverage of it, we should not determine the subject to be non-notable anyway on the basis of an original research reassessment. John254 19:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC) replyThe threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth.