- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Party lists in the New Zealand general election, 2017#ACT Party. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Ajf773 ( talk) 09:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Beth Houlbrooke ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local body politician that doesn't meet the requirements for WP:POLITICIAN. Unlikely to unless elected as an MP in the upcoming NZ general election. Nominated due to repeated attempts to recreate the article after redirects Ajf773 ( talk) 07:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 ( talk) 07:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 ( talk) 07:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom. Fails NPOL. "Just being an elected local official...does not guarantee notability". Redirect has been reverted by user who either does not understand this or refuses to accept it. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 08:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to consider removing the AfD. I have reinstated the redirect and protected the page from editing, so the disruption has ended. Schwede 66 09:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.