From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. The official closure is "No consensus". But I can see the possibility, in the future, of an editor Merging or Redirecting this article. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

BentallGreenOak

BentallGreenOak (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable investment company, seems to be affiliated with SunLife, which could perhaps be a merge target. I can only find PR pieces about them. Oaktree b ( talk) 23:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

These provide substantial explanations of the company's business.
BentallGreenOak is huge - they manage $47 billion worth of real estate.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 04:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Do you see how the the reuters article starts with a location, date, source (e.g. LONDON, Aug 2 (Reuters))? That's how you know its PR. Here's the announcement from Tetragon and you can see the Reuters article regurgitates it - fails ORGIND. The Pere article though is good enough to meet NCORP criteria as it contains in-depth opinion/analysis. On another read-through, no, the author uses a technique of summarising what has been said which was made clear by the included quotes later in the article. HighKing ++ 20:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Weak delete there are several concerns regarding its notability and compliance with Wikipedia's standards:
General Notability: Wikipedia's general notability guideline states that a topic is presumed to be suitable for a standalone article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Although the article mentions various acquisitions and investments made by BGO, and the above editors indicated some possible reliable sources it does not provide enough significant independent and secondary sources to establish its notability beyond basic facts. -- VertyBerty ( talk) 14:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Was Sun Life Financial the possible Merge target you had in mind Oaktree b?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply

It was yes. Oaktree b ( talk) 19:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, right now looking like a No Consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.