The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 22:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Mid-level bureaucrat, no significant coverage, anything available (within or outside of the article) is just of the bureaucrat postings and transfers notifications from the relevant govt department. Doesn't meet any of our SNGs either —
SpacemanSpiff 15:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Notability is
not inherited. So no, if he doesn't get over one of our notability standards on his own steam, then the fact of being married to someone else who might qualify for a Wikipedia article does not give him an automatic exemption from those standards.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nothing actually suggesting better for any applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. No
reliable source coverage shown at all — even the one source which actually constitutes real media coverage fails to even verify the claim being cited to it, as it doesn't actually mention his name at all. It supports the claim that his wife happens to hold a particular position, but fails to even verify the claim that he's married to her.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.