The result was delete. — Cryptic 18:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article has been nominated for speedy deletion. As I'm uncomfortable with carrying out this deletion speedily, I've listed the article here. No vote. -- Scimitar 20:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Please find comments listed on talk page for Ben Pfeiffer. He has been pioneer of industry since 1998 like many listed on the search engine optimization consultants category. It is a relatively new industry, so not as widely known, making notability a matter of subjective opinion and more difficult to establish for anyone. Orioncountry 20:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply
This is not advertising in anyway. Please see comments on orginal talk page. Try your search again Benjamin Pfeiffer and Rank Smart Orioncountry 20:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I tried to follow guidelines as best possible. As for the searches, even as a search marketer, I nor anyone else has control as to how those pages are organized in the search results. Many people who have pages on here, also have poor searches for their name or company. Orioncountry 21:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I didn't state it was a reason for inclusion, you stated it was a reason for exclusion in your comments before. If you exclude this article, then you might as well exclude all the rest that don't stand up to Wikipedia criteria because that would be in the fair unbiased nature of this site. I recommend doing additional research into the search marketing community before many decisions about this article or another one that is being contested. Orioncountry 21:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply