- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawing. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Below Zero (1930 film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. I could not find any significant coverage, though coverage in databases and WP:ROTM sources exists, but this does not help in meeting WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. The article does not meet any other NFILM criteria. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Covered in many books, including [1], [2], and [3] DonaldD23 talk to me 23:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, per Donald23's sources. I strongly suspect you can dig into the Internet Archive for contemporary reviews, also. Honestly, I can't imagine any Laurel and Hardy film failing inclusion standards. Lubal ( talk) 00:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Coverage mentioned by Donaldd23 + some I added to the page (see for yourself) + more existing.... - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.