- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America 1000 16:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Belle W. Baruch ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notability is not inherited, and nothing in the article speaks to individual notability Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 11:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Noted equestrian who won awards in international competition and who satisfies WP:BASIC per sources at article, a couple of which I just added. 24.151.10.165 ( talk) 20:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, based on improvements made since this discussion started, I think she is notable, passes GNG. Smmurphy( Talk) 07:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, looks notable enough to me. Zero talk 05:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep -- A bio Book published by a University Press implies notability. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.