- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 17:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Bear with me (video game) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass the video games notability guidelines. Ana r chyte 08:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I moved this to Draft:Bear With Me with the intention that he would work on it there. This game hasn't even released yet and hasn't received the coverage necessary to really pass notability guidelines. I say that this mainspace article should be deleted (since it's identical to the draft version) and the entry salted to prevent re-creation prior to the article's acceptance via AfC, as they've also tried to create this at Bear with me (where I first discovered it) and they tried to re-create it there rather than work on the draftspace copy as I requested. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- If it is salted,
Tokyogirl79, doesn't that mean only admins will be able to move the AfC from draft to mainspace? How would it work?
Ana
r
chyte
12:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly that - whomever accepts the article will have to get an admin to unsalt the page to ensure that it isn't accepted too soon. Mostly I want this as a deterrent for the article creator (although AfC does tend to be a little too lenient sometimes), as he's already shown that he'd be likely to try to re-create the article if it's left unsalted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- If it is salted,
Tokyogirl79, doesn't that mean only admins will be able to move the AfC from draft to mainspace? How would it work?
Ana
r
chyte
12:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Way way too soon as it is not scheduled for release until later this year. Notability cannot exists for a game that does not exist. Velella Velella Talk 11:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- While I agree that this is not notable I am unsure what you mean by a game that does not exists. if you mean games that are not yet released I strongly disagree since there is nothing in WP:N that even remotely states that unrelated media can't be notable. For example, while neither Super Mario Maker or Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice are yet to be released any attempt to delete them By claiming that the don't exist would fail miserably. if I misread that and does not exist meant something else please disregard.-- 76.65.42.44 ( talk) 21:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Too soon for an article. All I see on Google searches is social media. If this is being recreated, then I'd endorse salting the title. Unreleased products can be notable, but it takes press attention, and this typically doesn't happen outside of big budget, high profile works. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had too few hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. ( [1] [2] are fine for after it gets a few reviews) There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please {{ ping}} me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 05:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete At the moment it seems to fail WP:GNG. I can only find one recent article [3] since its announcement on SE Collective. -- The1337gamer ( talk) 14:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.