The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep - Proceural close - "No sources" isn't a valid reason for deletion, Clearly
WP:BEFORE hasn't been followed. (
non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 21:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Seems to have occurred, ergo is probably notable. We can't expect as many sources for such battles as we would have for battles involving Western European or North American countries. There seems to be some misapprehension that only online sources are valid, which is certainly not true. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 19:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep -- The article gives two sources. My guess is that reliable primary sources lie behind these.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per invalid deletion rationale, "it's unsourced" is not a reason to delete a page about a notable subject, that's why we have
WP:BEFORE.
Cavarrone 12:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.