The result was speedy keep: nomination withdrawn, with no "delete" recommendations left outstanding. Thanks to the editors who sourced and expanded the article. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply
Advanced search for: "banana powder" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Delete Not remotely significant enough to justify an encyclopaedia article.
JamesBWatson (
talk) 14:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn - see below.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
08:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
reply
Notability is the existence of multiple independent published works by people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy providing in depth coverage of a subject. If you're going to opine at AFD in any meaningful way, you have to put in the effort to determine that for each case, as Cullen328 has below. That's what the proper application of Wikipedia:Deletion policy requires. Dealing with notability correctly at AFD is not simply a case of reading the article alone and providing a subjective "It seems notable/not-notable to me." opinion. One must do the legwork and determine whether a subject actually is or is not objectively notable. This is the way that it's been all along. This is why our banana article wasn't deleted.
So use the handy little tool ⇗ and do that legwork. Uncle G ( talk) 19:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC) reply