The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: The series is notable, there is no point in deleting the article of a season when the series and rest of the seasons article exists and are notable.
Imsaneikigai (
talk)
20:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: it just started, there is some coverage, and it is the 4th instalment of a franchise. Redirect to the first season (or the 3d) if all in all this is not enough and if waiting for more is unbearable. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)14:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Baalveer is a hit notable series meant for kids since 2012 with 3 seasons already. Season 4 has just arrived. It deserves to be kept.
Pri2000 (
talk)
19:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - Those who are placing !vote in favour of the article, I want to ask them about the notability of the season itself, not about the series. We don't need a separate Wikipedia page for each of the seasons where the primary page exists and no reviews for the seasons are found. Placing interviews and
WP:IMDb links as references is just against
WP:ICTFSOURCES. Demonstrate notability or please stop flooding. A MERGE would be better. --
Twinkle1990 (
talk)
07:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
According to
WP:VOTESTACK Posting an appropriate notice on other users' talk pages to notify them about the deletion process is allowed (Posting an appropriate notice on users' talk pages in order to inform editors on all "sides" of a debate (e.g., everyone who participated in a previous deletion debate on a given subject) may be appropriate under certain circumstances). I notified them cause they also edit Indian tv show articles, I didn't tell to vote to keep the article so it's not violation of
WP:VOTESTACK.
M S Hassan (
talk)
18:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Just saying that the series is notable doesn’t make this season of the series notable. Maybe the series is notable, but establishing notability for a standalone article on Season 4 requires in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, which, in my opinion, is lacking. These sources are just interviews and announcements. The article currently fails to meet
WP:GNG as no in-depth coverage of the subject is found. Do we need to create new pages for every season even when there are no significant sources? Additionally, another issue that the patrolling Admin should address is
WP:VOTESTACK, which is the real reason behind these non-policy-based “Keep” votes.
GrabUp -
Talk13:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
For the record, I was not asked to come here and yet voted !Keep. So, Twinkle1990, and Grabup, may I ask you to please avoid or better, kindly amend sentences like please stop flooding, real reason behind these non-policy-based “Keep” votes apparently addressed to all Keep !voters. Thank you very much in advance. For the policy/reason backing my !vote, if unclear in my comment, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baalveer 3. I have no further comment. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)18:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Same here like Balveer 3 nomination. The sources do not have the quality and depth of coverage needed to warrant a page on this show. Fails
WP:GNG.
RangersRus (
talk)
13:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge with
Baalveer: while not a direct sequel, a section in the main article will not require independent notability. Most of the "Keep" comments here seem to talk about the notability of the Baalveer franchise, not that of Baalveer 4. Please note that Baalveer 3 is also on the chopping block, so merging with that would be a mistake.
Owen×☎10:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge with
Baalveer, notability standard not met for this precise series based on sources available and presented, per OwenX this can be folded into main article using non-notability-contributing references.
Daniel (
talk)
23:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.